The brand was doing about $37,800 a month, with most of it riding on a few products and the season. The goal was a dependable baseline above $120,000 a month instead of a good quarter followed by a slow one.
A good product with a listing that was not converting the traffic it already had. The main image showed the jar and nothing else, so it read as a commodity next to competitors.
The previous approach chased the same sales target every month, including months when nobody was shopping for planting supplies. That burned ad spend in the quiet months and left the account unprepared for the real season.
After a strong Q4 the account needed to hold that momentum through Q1. The budget was spread across campaigns without enough weight on the terms and placements that were already winning.
Sales had flattened around $19,700 a month. Paid traffic was not turning into organic visibility, and the structure was not efficient enough to justify spending harder.
After a strong year, sales had been sliding, and previous management had not found a way past $100,000 a month. Q4 demand was soft for this category, while Q1 historically brought stronger search volume and conversion.
Shoppers were landing on the listing, but the main image showed a plain rope and handles. It did not show the included accessories or why this rope was worth the price.
Demand was strong across the line, but several listings were not converting as well as they should. The main images were functional and did not communicate value, use case or quality at first glance.
Client names, ASINs and identifying details are withheld. Figures are adjusted for confidentiality while keeping the scale of each result, and every projection is labeled as a projection.
90 minutes. No deck. A straight read on your Amazon account and where the ad spend is leaking.
Four aces. One hand.
Book your free auditOr email us at team@acefold.com